Click to upload or drag and drop
PDF, DOCX, PPTX, TXT, JPG, JPEG, PNG, HEIC, ODP, ODT, BMP, or TIFF
up to 20MB
Uploading...
Use Copilot if your organization already runs on Microsoft 365 and pays for a Copilot license, because Copilot in Forms puts the generated questions straight into a scoreable quiz instead of a chat window. Use ChatGPT if you want control over format, want to iterate on individual questions, or have no Microsoft license. Neither one gives you a printable student copy and a separate answer key as two files, which is the gap most teachers and trainers actually run into.
That is the whole answer. The rest of this is the detail behind it, because the two tools fail in different places and knowing which failure you are about to hit saves the afternoon.
| Job | Microsoft Copilot | ChatGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of entry | Microsoft 365 account plus a Copilot license for the Forms draft control | Free tier writes questions; file handling is better on paid tiers |
| Where the output lands | Inside a Forms quiz, already scoreable | In a chat thread, as text |
| Auto scoring and responses | Strong. It is a Forms quiz, so responses collect and score in Microsoft 365 | None. You move the questions somewhere that scores them |
| Format control | Limited to what the Forms draft flow produces | High. Ask for a table, a numbered list, an import format, and it complies |
| Iterating on one weak question | Awkward once the draft is in the form | Natural. Rewrite item nine, keep the rest |
| Answer explanations | Yes, an explicit option when generating | Yes, if you ask for them |
| Long source documents | Content is usually pasted into the draft box, so length is limited by what you paste | Better, though coverage still degrades on long material |
| Printable test plus separate key | Not the design. Forms is a web form | No. You reformat by hand |
The last mile. Every AI tool can write twenty multiple choice questions. Almost none of them hand you something a class can sit and be graded on. Copilot in Forms does, because the draft is created inside a Forms quiz with the answers already marked, and Forms handles collection and scoring from there. If you are in a school or company that lives inside Microsoft 365, that removes a real chunk of work, and no outside tool can match the integration.
The catch is the license. Microsoft requires a Microsoft 365 account and a Copilot license for the Draft with Copilot control, and in most education tenants Forms is included while Copilot is a separate purchase. So the container is free and the generation is not, which is backwards from where the time actually goes.
Iteration and format. You can ask for questions in a specific layout, then say question seven is too easy, make it an application question, and get exactly that back without regenerating the set. You can ask for a mix of formats in fixed proportions. You can ask it to name the section each question came from so you can audit coverage in ten seconds. None of that is comfortable once a draft is sitting inside a Forms quiz.
It is also available to people with no institutional license at all, which describes a lot of adjuncts, tutors, and small training teams.
Two things, consistently.
Coverage clusters at the front. Generated questions bunch toward the opening pages of the source, because that is where the text tends to be densest and most definitional. On a forty page chapter you will often find twelve of fifteen questions came from the first twelve pages. The fix is an explicit instruction to spread items evenly across all sections and to label the source section for each question, then count.
Distractors are weak. Stems are usually fine. Wrong options are where the quality drops, and a question with three obviously absurd options is one a student answers correctly without reading the material. Asking for distractors drawn from real terms elsewhere in the source improves this a lot, and it still needs a human pass.
Ask a teacher what they need on Friday and it is rarely a chat transcript. It is a numbered student copy to print or share, and a separate answer key that does not accidentally get handed out with it. Copilot gives you a live web form. ChatGPT gives you text you reformat. Both leave you doing the last twenty minutes by hand, every week.
That is the specific job a document to quiz converter does: the source file goes in, and a numbered student copy plus a matching answer key come back as two separate files, with no prompt to write. If you want the prompt libraries and honest splits for each assistant, they are on the Copilot quiz generator and ChatGPT quiz generator pages, and Google's equivalent with its verified document limits is on the Gemini quiz generator page.
Copilot is better if you are inside Microsoft 365 with a license, because the questions land in a scoreable Forms quiz. ChatGPT is better for format control and for iterating on individual questions. Neither produces a printable student copy with a separate answer key.
It can, though the reliable route is pasting the content into the Draft with Copilot box in Forms rather than relying on a file upload. Upload behavior in Copilot chat varies by license and tenant policy, and admins commonly cap upload sizes, so it is not something to build a weekly workflow around.
On paid tiers it handles attached files well. The practical limits are coverage rather than acceptance: on a long document the questions skew toward the opening sections unless you explicitly ask for even coverage and section labels.
Yes, and the review is short if you know where to look. Check the coverage spread, rewrite the two or three weakest sets of distractors, and verify any number, date, or name that appears in a stem against the source. Five minutes on a twenty item set is normal.
ChatGPT's free tier will write questions today with no purchase. Copilot in Forms requires a paid Microsoft 365 account plus a Copilot license, so for an individual teacher outside a licensed tenant it is not really a comparison.
From the same family of tools