← Blog
Teaching isn’t about piling on more work. It’s about picking a few moves that make learning stick. If you teach, study, or just love a good quiz, you’re in the right spot.
I pulled together the top 10 teaching strategies that show up in research and actually fit a real schedule. You’ll see quick routines, quiz ideas that don’t add grading, and tools that won’t wreck your budget.
Here’s what you’ll get:
Let’s turn solid teaching into habits you can keep—and make every quiz pull its weight.
Busy teachers who want results without a second job’s worth of prep. Students who want to study smarter, not longer. Anyone who enjoys data from quick checks and quizzes.
We’ll zero in on strategies that boost learning gains and still fit bell-to-bell. Think three-minute warm-ups, tight modeling with a worked example, and a short exit slip that actually tells you what to do next. You’ll also see which quiz tools earn a spot in your toolkit and how students can run their own spaced practice without waiting on you.
One mindset to keep: attention, memory, and motivation are budgets. Spend them on routines that pay you back—like a five-minute retrieval check that saves you twenty minutes of reteaching next week.
I leaned on solid evidence and classroom practicality. Research from Dunlosky and others puts practice testing and spaced practice at the top; rereading sits near the bottom. Black and Wiliam’s work shows that formative assessment, when acted on right away, moves achievement in a big way.
We also looked at cognitive load: explicit instruction, worked examples, and gradual release make complex tasks doable for novices. And equity isn’t an add-on here—UDL and language supports are part of the design, with low-tech options alongside apps. You’ll notice a theme of coherence: retrieval and spacing hold everything together between lessons.
Make your thinking visible. State the goal, model the process step by step, then guide students from supported practice to independence. The worked examples effect tells us novices learn faster when they study a solved problem before trying one on their own.
In math or science, talk through a stoichiometry problem while annotating, then hand students an almost-matching problem with one step removed. Toss in a hinge question—“Which step is extra here?”—to see who’s ready to move on.
When writing MCQs, use a distractor that mirrors a common mistake (like flipping a ratio). That way, the item teaches you where to reteach. Close with a quick comparison: show two solution paths and have students argue which is more efficient. That tiny reflection speeds transfer to new problems.
Retrieval is pulling info out of memory. It feels harder than rereading, and that’s the point. Roediger and Karpicke found students who tested themselves remembered more than those who restudied—even when the testers felt less confident.
Keep it small and steady: two questions at the bell, a one-minute free recall mid-class, or an exit ticket where they explain a step from memory. Mix topics and add spacing. A simple 1–2–7–14-day rotation works well and is easy to automate in an LMS.
Have students rate confidence after each item. High-confidence errors = misconceptions worth a quick mini-lesson. Low-confidence correct answers need a fast revisit tomorrow. Keep a “memory log” of items you plan to resurface so students know what’s coming and why.
Spread reviews out. Cepeda’s research suggests the ideal gap depends on how long you want learning to last, but a practical classroom pattern is next day, a few days later, one week, two weeks.
Tag quiz items to standards and dates so your LMS can re-queue them later. For students, a calendar or an app that surfaces “about-to-be-forgotten” cards does the job. Start a new lesson by bridging to prior knowledge: “Before we do linear functions, what do you remember about proportional reasoning?” That short prompt reduces reteach time down the line.
Think of spacing as maintenance. It protects every minute you spent on initial instruction.
Formative assessment is evidence you gather during learning, used to decide the next move. Black and Wiliam showed big gains when students know where they are, where they’re going, and how to close the gap.
Go for high signal, low load: two targeted items after a mini-lesson, a quick self-rating against success criteria, or a confidence-weighted MCQ. Feedback should point to the change: “You named the theorem—now justify step 3 using angle properties.”
Speed matters. If students can’t use your feedback today or by tomorrow, it came too late. Build the check and the response into the lesson skeleton so it actually happens.
Get students doing the thinking. Large studies (Hake) and models like Peer Instruction (Mazur) show better conceptual gains when learners answer, discuss, and then answer again.
Use a conceptual clicker question. First, individual vote. Then pair up to compare reasoning and revote. Keep products small—one claim, one piece of evidence, one explanation. Clear roles help quieter students step in during that second vote.
Collect a brief written rationale at the end to tie discussion to individual accountability. Bring the same concept back next week in a spaced quiz to lock it in.
Support just enough, then fade. The I Do → We Do → You Do pattern aligns with cognitive load and Rosenshine’s Principles: small steps, guided practice, frequent checks.
Try partially worked problems that hide different steps so students practice decision-making, not just mechanics. In writing, start with a mentor paragraph and sentence frames, then remove the frames but keep a checklist, then move to fully independent drafts.
Plan the fade on purpose. After the We Do, give one transfer item to a new-but-similar task. Use the result to decide which supports to pull next class. Begin the following day by having students recall yesterday’s steps from memory before any prompts.
Design for variation from the start. Tomlinson’s ideas on readiness and interest pair well with CAST’s UDL Guidelines: offer multiple ways to engage, represent, and express.
Provide text, audio, and visual explanations of the same idea. Let students show understanding with a short video or a written argument. Adjust reading level without watering down the concept. Turn on captions, add alt text, and use read-aloud tools—helpful for multilingual learners and for anyone who benefits from reduced decoding load.
Keep the cognitive goal constant while varying response mode. Choice is a scaffold, not a prize. Over time, coach students to pick the “productive struggle” option—challenging enough to learn, not enough to overload.
Start with an authentic problem and guide the investigation. PBL can lift engagement and transfer when projects have a clear driving question, milestones, and criteria. PBLWorks has useful design guides if you’re new to this.
Use guided inquiry so novices don’t flounder. Teach background knowledge explicitly, then drop in just-in-time mini-lessons as teams work. Example driving question: “How can we design a water filter that meets cost and safety limits?” That sets up math, science, and ELA, plus short milestone quizzes to check prerequisites before building.
Run a quick pre-mortem: teams list three ways their plan could fail, then design a fast test for each risk. End with a brief individual reflection on the most transferable idea, and revisit it a week later in a new context.
Move first exposure to a short video or reading so you can use class time for practice and feedback. Reviews (Bishop & Verleger; Lo & Hew) show modest gains when flipping is done with intention.
Keep videos under eight minutes, stick to one objective, and embed a couple of auto-graded questions. Give guided notes. In class, tackle the most-missed items first, then shift to application work with quick checks.
Offer two entry ramps: a two-minute recap for anyone who missed the pre-work and a challenge prompt for those ready to extend. No reliable internet? Run a station rotation in class for the same effect.
Use points, badges, and challenges carefully and on purpose. Reviews (Hamari; Dichev & Dicheva) suggest engagement often rises when goals and feedback are clear, though results vary.
Try “quests and badges” tied to specific skills. Students attempt a short retrieval check to earn a badge, then unlock optional extensions. Keep points informational rather than transactional so mastery stays front and center.
Let students “bank” learning from outside class—explaining a concept to a sibling counts if they submit a short reflection mapped to your rubric. Add periodic resets so late starters can still succeed. Watch analytics for students with lots of points but weak transfer and adjust supports.
Write to your goals. Start with clear success criteria, then draft items that measure those targets. For MCQs, keep stems clean, avoid “all of the above,” and write distractors that reflect real misconceptions.
Blend item types: selected response for breadth, short explanations for reasoning, and the occasional two-tier item (answer + justification). After each quiz, check difficulty and common wrong choices. Quick item analysis helps you group students for a short clinic the next day. Add one “upgrade” item that asks students to apply the same idea in a fresh context—great signal for readiness.
Week 1: add a two-question retrieval warm-up to every class. Model one example with explicit instruction and a worked solution.
Week 2: end mini-lessons with a tiny formative check and a 60-second feedback moment that points to the next action. Start your spacing log so today’s items show up next week.
Week 3: add one cooperative routine (peer instruction with a revote works well) and introduce a single mastery badge for a core skill. Keep grading light.
Week 4: flip one micro-lesson with a five-minute video and an embedded question. In class, hit the most-missed idea, then run a short milestone quiz that spirals the month. Post the spacing calendar in your LMS so everyone knows when past content returns.
Start with the job, not the tool. Need fast warm-ups and exit tickets? Use lightweight apps with auto-grading and question banks. Want richer tasks with multimedia? Try interactive slide or video tools.
Free tiers of Quizizz, Kahoot, and Quizlet are a good first stop. If you need deeper analytics or standards tracking, add a formative platform later. Prioritize randomization, image/audio support, LMS integration, clean exports, and student data privacy (FERPA/GDPR). Short on devices? Plickers or paper scan forms keep checks feasible.
Watch “downtime friction”—how fast you can go from idea to live check. Tools that reduce clicks get used. Departments should look for shared banks, objective tags, and common assessment features, without boxing teachers in.
Trade rereading for self-quizzing. The research is clear: practice testing and spaced practice beat highlighting and cramming. Sketch a simple schedule: review a day later, then 3 days, a week, two weeks. Apps help, but a calendar gets it done.
When you quiz yourself, close the notes first. Write what you remember, then check and correct in another color so you can see progress. With multiple choice, add a line on why the right answer is right and why the tempting one is wrong. Keep a short “leech list” of items you keep missing and hit those first next session. Treat mistakes like feedback and pay attention to low-confidence correct answers—they need a quick revisit tomorrow.
Plan for variability from the start. Offer multiple ways to access content and show learning: captions, alt text, readable fonts, solid color contrast, bilingual glossaries, and read-aloud tools.
Provide low-tech options too: printable notes, Plickers for polling, and mini-whiteboards for checks when devices are scarce. In quizzes, keep the thinking goal the same while allowing typed, spoken, or drawn responses. Use time flexibly when speed isn’t the skill. Invite students to help audit materials for barriers and celebrate the fixes. Ownership reduces stigma and boosts use of supports.
How often should I quiz? Go little and often: 2–3 quick items daily as warm-ups or exit tickets, plus a short weekly spiral. It builds memory without burying you in grading.
Strategy vs. technique? A strategy is the big approach (like spaced practice). A technique is the move you use to run it (like the 1–2–7–14-day schedule).
Large classes? Keep checks short, use polls or hands-up protocols, and sample enough responses to decide your next step. Grading load heavy? Let auto-graded items handle breadth, then add one short explanation for depth. Remote or hybrid? Use embedded-question videos and prompts that require explanation, not just a click.
Motivation low? Frame quizzes as memory tools, not judgments. Consider dropping the lowest score. Effort usually rises when students know practice won’t sink their grade.
Start with Dunlosky et al. on effective learning techniques. Then read Roediger & Karpicke on the testing effect and Cepeda on spacing intervals. For assessment that actually shifts learning, see Black & Wiliam, and for clear teaching moves, Rosenshine’s Principles is gold.
Active learning? Look at Hake’s large-scale study and Mazur’s Peer Instruction. UDL resources live at CAST. For PBL, PBLWorks has practical guides. Flipped learning overviews from Bishop & Verleger and meta-analyses by Lo & Hew give balanced takes. Gamification reviews by Hamari and by Dichev & Dicheva map benefits and cautions. For writing better test items, check Haladyna’s guidelines.
Do less, but do it on purpose. Clear modeling and sensible scaffolds. Frequent, low-stakes checks. Retrieval and spacing to glue learning together. Sprinkle in active work, a bit of inquiry or a short flip, and use gamification lightly. Write tighter questions, scan the data, adjust fast. Pick two strategies, start a daily 2–3 question routine, and set a simple 1–2–7–14 review rhythm. Teachers, choose one tool and try it this week. Students, build your first spaced deck and test yourself tomorrow.