Click to upload or drag and drop
PDF, DOCX, PPTX, TXT, JPG, JPEG, PNG, HEIC, ODP, ODT, BMP, or TIFF
up to 20MB
Uploading...
The short answer: upload the scanned PDF, set how many questions you want, and generate. The pages are read visually, the same way you read them, so there is no OCR step to run first and nothing to retype. A ten page scanned chapter takes about a minute and comes back as questions with the answer key marked. The one thing that matters is legibility: if you can read the page comfortably on your own screen, so can the model.
This surprises people who tried it a few years ago, when quiz tools worked purely by pulling text out of a file and a scan came back empty. That constraint is gone on any tool built on a vision capable model. It is worth knowing the difference, because plenty of guides still open by telling you to OCR everything first.
Try to select a sentence with your cursor, or search the document for a word you can plainly see on the page. If nothing highlights and the search finds nothing, each page is stored as an image rather than as text. That is a scan. Anything from a scanner, a photocopier, a camera or a screenshot falls into this category, along with most older textbooks and archived documents.
It is useful to know which you have, mostly so you can predict how other software will behave with the file. For generating questions here, it changes nothing about what you do.
File type is not the variable. Capture quality is. These are the things worth fixing before you upload.
| Problem with the scan | Effect on the quiz | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Blurry or low resolution | Small print gets misread, so a few questions quote the wrong term | Re-shoot in better focus, or scan at a higher setting |
| Page photographed at an angle | Text near the far edge is lost, so that content never appears | Shoot flat and square on, one page at a time |
| Glare or a hand shadow | A band of the page is unreadable and silently skipped | Move the light source, or use a scanner app that flattens exposure |
| Faded or over-copied original | Fewer usable questions overall | Find a cleaner copy if one exists, or supplement with your notes |
| Cropped edges | Captions and margin notes are missing from the quiz | Re-capture with the full page in frame |
| Page is mostly diagram | Very little testable text on that page | Pair it with the lecture notes covering the same figure |
Every row is about how readable the page is. None of them is about the file format, which is the practical point.
No. The pages are read as images, so a scan goes straight in. OCR is still worth running for other reasons: when a scan is poor and you want to see and correct the recovered text yourself before anything is built on it, when you need the document searchable and copy-pasteable, or when you are digitizing an archive and want one clean text version to keep. A dedicated engine like DocuOCR document data extraction handles that properly and gives you output you can inspect. For the specific job of turning a scanned chapter into questions, it is an extra step that buys you nothing.
Yes, when the handwriting is legible, and neatness matters more than anything else. Clear print style writing on lined paper reads well. Cramped cursive, faint pencil and heavily abbreviated notes read less well, and you will see that in the questions. Photograph the pages flat under even light and upload them like any other file. A semester of handwritten pages turns into practice questions from your own notes more reliably than most people expect.
Yes. A phone photo is a scan captured by your camera and uploads identically. Lay the book flat so the spine does not curve the text away, fill the frame with the page, avoid overhead glare, and shoot facing pages separately rather than as one wide image. Ten pages photographed properly beats thirty photographed in a hurry.
Around three to five solid questions per page of substantive content, so a ten page chapter usually lands between thirty and fifty. That matches what the same chapter would yield as a native PDF. A poor capture reduces the count rather than quietly producing wrong questions, because pages that cannot be read simply contribute less.
Because they read text rather than pages. A tool that only extracts a text layer opens a scan, finds nothing, and either errors out or falls back on general knowledge about the subject. That fallback is the giveaway: the questions sound plausible but do not reference anything specific to your document. If you have seen that behavior, it was the tool, not your scan. There is more detail in whether AI quiz makers work on scanned PDFs.
Photocopied handouts, older textbooks, printed notes and archived documents are some of the most common material people need to test themselves on, and it is usually the material with no digital version anywhere. Once a scan is in, you are not limited to a quiz: the same upload can produce a study guide with the concepts, glossary and review questions for the same pages, or a set of flashcards. Start with the scanned PDF to quiz tool and see what your worst photocopy comes back with, which is usually more than you would guess.